Recording: https://www.youtube.com/live/JB7hVxtRLBc?si=AM7UX_nT5RPd2sWq
It is with great pleasure that we welcome you to this pivotal moment in the journey of Debate Institute Africa. Today marks the beginning of an important chapter, as we embark on our first formal analysis of mainstream debating—a vital step in our mission to expand the culture of debate throughout Africa and beyond.
For years, we have worked tirelessly to spread the values of debate education across the continent, fostering critical thinking, dialogue, and the skills necessary for constructive discourse. But today, we take that vision a step further. We are here to examine and engage with the wider world of mainstream debating—an arena where the exchange of ideas shapes policies, perceptions, and futures on the global stage.
As a case study for this exploration, we will begin with a meta-analysis of a key event in modern political debate: the U.S. presidential debate between Kamala Harris and Donald Trump. This moment in history encapsulated many of the dynamics of mainstream debate—sharp clashes of ideas, rhetorical strategies, and the impact of public discourse on political narratives. Our discussion today will not only reflect on the content and strategies of that debate but also explore the broader implications for debate as a tool for public engagement and political decision-making.
As we enter this discussion, we are also opening the doors to the future of our institution. Debate is not just a skill—it is a form of intellectual leadership. As we move forward, Debate Institute Africa aims to contribute to the evolving landscape of global discourse, positioning ourselves as a think tank where debate, research, and analysis converge. We envision a future where African voices shape not only local discussions but also global ones—participating fully in the realm of mainstream debates that affect policies, governance, and societal progress.
In doing so, we acknowledge the long and rich history of mainstream debating. From the early debates in ancient Greece and Rome to the formal structures of parliamentary and presidential debates today, this tradition has evolved, adapting to changing political and social realities. Yet, at its core, debate remains a tool for expressing diverse perspectives, challenging assumptions, and reaching new understandings. We stand at the intersection of this tradition and the future—a future where Africa can play a pivotal role in shaping the global conversation.
As we begin our analysis, I encourage all of you to engage deeply, question freely, and think broadly. Today is about more than reflecting on a single event—it is about opening new pathways for Debate Institute Africa to contribute to a broader intellectual landscape.
In our meta-analysis of the debate between Kamala Harris and Donald Trump, we observe a number of significant clashes on key issues that defined the political landscape at the time. From healthcare and the handling of the COVID-19 pandemic to economic policies and racial justice, the two figures stood in sharp contrast. Kamala Harris presented a vision rooted in expanding access to healthcare, protecting marginalized communities, and emphasizing science-driven responses to the pandemic, while Trump, defending his administration’s record, emphasized deregulation, economic recovery, and a more hands-off governmental approach. These clashes not only revealed the ideological divide between the candidates but also highlighted the different rhetorical strategies employed—Harris often leaned on facts and empathy, while Trump used a more forceful, combative style. Understanding these points of contention offers a deeper insight into the dynamics of mainstream political debates and their broader societal impact.
The discussion was enriched by the insights of our distinguished panelists, each of whom brings a unique perspective and wealth of experience to the table. First, we have Jibril Sekandi, the 2024 Debate Cranes Captain and a multiple award-winning debate champion, whose leadership and debating prowess have set a high standard for competitive debate in Africa. Next, Saviour Arinda, the Team Leader of Debate Institute Africa, whose vision and dedication have been central to driving this institution forward in spreading the culture of debate across the continent. Finally, we were joined by Joseph Tahinduka, our Fundraising Lead, who plays a crucial role in ensuring that Debate Institute Africa continues to grow, develop, and expand its reach. Together, they guided us through a thoughtful exploration of the Harris-Trump debate and the broader challenges and opportunities that mainstream debating presents.”